| From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts |
| Date: | 2021-01-08 05:02:51 |
| Message-ID: | 6e5b7836-06a2-0a0a-0ef9-a6572789cc6b@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 1/7/21 4:51 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Thanks for the review! I pushed the latest patch.
>
Thanks all of you for your precious help on this patch!
The original idea behind this thread has been split into 3 pieces.
Pieces 1 (9d0bd95fa90a7243047a74e29f265296a9fc556d) and 2
(0650ff23038bc3eb8d8fd851744db837d921e285) have now been committed, the
last one is to add more information regarding the canceled statements
(if any), like:
* What was the blocker(s) doing?
* When did the blocker(s) started their queries (if any)?
* What was the blocker(s) waiting for? on which wait event?
Does this proposal sound good to you? If so I'll start a new thread with
a patch proposal.
Bertrand
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-01-08 05:12:02 | RE: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-01-08 04:29:36 | Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command |