Re: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Date: 2019-03-07 08:45:04
Message-ID: 6e534faa-b92e-349d-2d63-c60b9190fa4f@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/7/19 2:23 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:05:56PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> On 2/6/19 10:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch to do that and close the gap. With that, we will
>>> be able to check for inconsistencies better when working on the
>>> follow-up patches. What do you think?
>>
>> I approve. I was when testing this stuff that I found the IF NOT EXISTS
>> issue.
>
> Thanks, I have committed those extra tests to close the gap.

I think a new patch is required here so I have marked this Waiting on
Author. cfbot is certainly not happy and anyone trying to review is
going to have hard time trying to determine what to review.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-03-07 08:54:09 Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-07 08:40:36 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons