| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-03-27 18:52:19 |
| Message-ID: | 6e2dc7a1-7fda-71cf-764e-2696238dae4c@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 03/27/2018 01:46 PM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> Running v41 with "partition_prune" under valgrind gives the attached
> report.
>
The reports mostly involve interaction with catcache.c and dynahash.c,
so something for a separate thread.
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2018-03-27 19:08:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
| Previous Message | Adrien Nayrat | 2018-03-27 18:37:09 | Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |