Re: error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker
Date: 2017-04-11 18:10:02
Message-ID: 6e024277-d7f1-193a-0caf-af6eb7068ab2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/11/17 11:47, David G. Johnston wrote:
> ​A potential middle-ground is to start, but then only allow superuser
> connections.

Then you might as well start and allow all connections. I don't see
what this buys.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-11 18:23:46 Re: bumping HASH_VERSION to 3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-11 18:08:49 Re: TAP tests take a long time