Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test

From: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test
Date: 2022-11-25 07:13:29
Message-ID: 6dbfaa38-ca32-96bc-7d6d-ad0714d1553c@inbox.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, thanks for rapid answer!

On 25.11.2022 08:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You are not using MSVC but MinGW, are you? The buildfarm members with
> TAP tests enabled are drongo, fairywren, bowerbord and jacana. Even
> though none of them are running the tests from
> src/test/authentication/, this is running on a periodic basis in the
> CI, where we are able to skip the test in MSVC already:
> postgresql:authentication / authentication/003_peer SKIP 9.73s

There is MSVC on my PC. The project was build with
Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.29.30136 for x64

> So yes, it is plausible that we are missing more safeguards here.
>
> Your suggestion to skip under !$use_unix_sockets makes sense, as not
> having unix sockets is not going to work for peer and WIN32 needs SSPI
> to be secure with pg_regress. Where is your test failing? On the
> first $node->psql('postgres') at the beginning of the test? Just
> wondering..

The test fails almost at the beginning in reset_pg_hba call after
modification pg_hba.conf and node reloading:
#t/003_peer.pl .. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
#No subtests run

Logs regress_log_003_peer and 003_peer_node.log are attached.

With best regards,

--
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
003_peer_node.log text/x-log 1.1 KB
regress_log_003_peer text/plain 3.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2022-11-25 07:27:55 Re: A problem about join ordering
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-11-25 06:40:20 Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn