Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Andreas Karlsson" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>,"pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions
Date: 2020-03-23 16:26:20
Message-ID: 6d55838c-9353-486f-a508-77ee07d59667@manitou-mail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> What is that status of this patch set? I think we have nailed down the
> behavior, but there were some concerns about certain performance
> characteristics. Do people feel that those are required to be addressed
> in this cycle?

Not finding any other issue with v3 or objections in the thread,
I've set the status to Ready For Committer in the CF.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-23 16:44:46 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-03-23 16:24:18 Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE