On 8/3/26 8:21 PM, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like this field was write-only since its introduction in
> 3592e0ff98b. The proposed patch removes dead code.
>
Agree.
Based on the latest code and 3592e0ff98b, it is clear that this field
was not used. Perhaps during this period, some of the codes might have
accessed this field. But this does not affect the fact that they are
currently in a useless state.
--
Quan Zongliang