| From: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add id's to various elements in protocol.sgml |
| Date: | 2022-03-03 14:17:12 |
| Message-ID: | 6bf4b08a-b882-281e-a330-cdc9e0248d88@gmx.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.03.2022 at 18:54, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Perhaps there are a bunch of variablelists where no one cares about
> linking to any of the entries.
>
> So maybe a useful non-terminating message to add eventually would
> be one that identifies any varlistentry lacking an id, with a
> variablelist where at least one other entry has an id.
That sounds like areasonable approach for now.
Is there anybody objecting to pursue this? Do you need more examples how
it would look like?
It would be a bit hurtful to generate a patch that manually adds ~600
ids just to have it rejected as unwanted.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2022-03-03 14:38:28 | Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats |
| Previous Message | Frédéric Yhuel | 2022-03-03 14:12:46 | Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? |