| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, wenjing(at)gmail(dot)com, Andrew Bille <andrewbille(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tony Zhu <Tony(dot)zhu(at)ww-it(dot)cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
| Date: | 2022-06-30 20:54:39 |
| Message-ID: | 6bc283b6-11e6-94a7-14fb-cb91da5d6369@timescale.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/3/22 13:20, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-03-03 16:07:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I agree that the feature is desirable, but I think getting there is
>> going to require a huge amount of effort that may amount to a total
>> rewrite of the patch.
>
> Agreed. I think this needs very fundamental design work, and the patch itself
> isn't worth reviewing until that's tackled.
Given two opinions that the patch can't be effectively reviewed as-is, I
will mark this RwF for this commitfest. Anyone up for shepherding the
design conversations, going forward?
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-06-30 21:05:20 | Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-06-30 20:43:21 | Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT |