Re: jsonpath syntax extensions

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath syntax extensions
Date: 2021-03-15 12:25:15
Message-ID: 6af73baa-a440-f6be-9a3a-ed688e35b56d@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/3/21 9:44 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/4/20 3:18 PM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
>> On 04.03.2020 19:13, David Steele wrote:
>>> On 2/27/20 10:57 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Attached patches implement several useful jsonpath syntax extensions.
>>>> I already published them two years ago in the original SQL/JSON thread,
>>>> but then after creation of separate threads for SQL/JSON functions and
>>>> JSON_TABLE I forgot about them.
>>>
>>> Are these improvements targeted at PG13 or PG14?  This seems to be a
>>> pretty big change for the last CF of PG13.  I know these have been
>>> submitted before but that was a few years ago so I think they count
>>> as new.
>>
>> I believe that some of these improvements can get into PG13.  There is
>> no need
>> to review all of them, we can choose only the simplest ones.
> Another year has passed without any comment or review on this patch set.
>
> I'm not sure why the feature is not generating any interest, but you
> might want to ask people who have been involved in JSON path before if
> they are interested in reviewing.
>
> Since this is still essentially a new feature with no review before this
> CF I still don't think it is a good candidate for v14 but let's see if
> it gets some review.
Target version updated to 15.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-15 12:29:40 subscriptionCheck failures
Previous Message David Steele 2021-03-15 12:18:29 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch