| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesperpedersen(dot)db(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: scary patch contest |
| Date: | 2026-08-25 20:36:25 |
| Message-ID: | 6aa83145-822a-4ca8-a6e1-028470dc2f75@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 8/25/26 4:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not sure about that last part, because this came out of an
> LLM-driven analysis of features that required a lot of post-commit
> fixing. It's not unique in that, but it has required a lot of fixes.
>
My suggestion would be use multiple LLMs and see if they agree as using
orangu /auto_review give very different results based on the LLM loaded.
You didn't state which LLM you used with Claude. A lot of people still
liked Opus 4.8 more than Opus 5, and few like Fable 5.
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-08-25 21:36:07 | Re: Changing client-side behavior regarding Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2026-08-25 20:26:42 | Re: scary patch contest |