From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tobias Brox" <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Limit + group + join |
Date: | 2005-08-29 18:41:46 |
Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD207@Herge.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tobias wrote:
> Splendid :-) Unfortunately we will not be upgrading for some monthes
> still,
> but anyway I'm happy. This provides yet another good argument for
> upgrading
> sooner. I'm also happy to see such a perfect match:
>
> - A problem that can be reduced from beeing complex and
> production-specific, to simple and easily reproducible.
>
> - Enthusiastic people testing it and pinpointing even more precisely
what
> conditions will cause the condition
>
> - Programmers actually fixing the issue
>
> - Testers verifying that it was fixed
>
> Long live postgresql! :-)
In the last three or so years since I've been really active with
postgresql, I've found two or three issues/bugs which I was able to
reproduce and reduce to a test case. In all instances the fix was in
cvs literally within minutes.
Merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-08-29 19:56:15 | getting an index to work with partial indices ... |
Previous Message | asif ali | 2005-08-29 18:07:17 | Re: Weird performance drop after VACUUM |