| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Ready for RC3? |
| Date: | 2004-12-28 13:43:06 |
| Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7585@Herge.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> There is the issue with shared mem on Win2003 that came up the other
> day. I don't think it's a general error, but rather something
> environment specific. (I've had several reports of ppl with fairly
large
> databases in production on win2003 that don't have this problem). But
> it'd be good to have confirmation on that. If we could give that one a
> couple of days, it would be good, but it's not a showstopper.
I just confirmed this an a dual Opteron box running *win2k* on a
realease candidate built less than a week ago. :-(. I was trying to
upgrade a production server to retest the statistics collector...I'm
going to try a fresh compile but may have to revert back to beta5.
FATAL: could not attach to proper memory at fixed address:
shmget(key=5432001, addr=00BB0000) failed: Invalid argument
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-28 15:41:27 | Re: Ready for RC3? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-12-28 13:24:19 | Re: Ready for RC3? |