| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items |
| Date: | 2004-05-06 16:18:47 |
| Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AE0A@Herge.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I tweaked things so that the clustered flag is preserved for indexes
> that aren't directly affected by the ALTER TYPE. It would take more
> work to preserve the setting for an index that is rebuilt by ALTER
TYPE,
> and I'm not even sure that it's sensible --- the new index could have
> a significantly different ordering from the old. What do you think?
Fair enough. Perhaps a notice level log message would be appropriate?
Merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sdv mailer | 2004-05-06 16:19:56 | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-06 16:17:38 | Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains |