Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison
Date: 2004-02-23 14:29:35
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AD4F@Herge.rcsinc.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Robert Treat wrote:
> This came across the wire yesterday, thought I would pass it along. It
> compares PostgreSQL vs. a "Major Proprietary Database"

Are you (or anybody else) aware of any similar studies comparing pg to
SQL Server?  A study detailing not just performance but also reliability
and administrative advantages, as well as PHB type stuff such as TCO,
ROI, etc. would be nice.

On another note, it's a pretty safe bet for this site to expect a
takedown notice from the good folks at Oracle who have structured their
license agreements to prevent precisely this kind of study from getting



pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: scott.marloweDate: 2004-02-23 18:38:00
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-02-23 13:27:47
Subject: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group