| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |
| Date: | 2004-02-23 14:29:35 |
| Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AD4F@Herge.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Treat wrote:
> This came across the wire yesterday, thought I would pass it along. It
> compares PostgreSQL vs. a "Major Proprietary Database"
>
> http://research.rem.nl/performance.html
Are you (or anybody else) aware of any similar studies comparing pg to
SQL Server? A study detailing not just performance but also reliability
and administrative advantages, as well as PHB type stuff such as TCO,
ROI, etc. would be nice.
On another note, it's a pretty safe bet for this site to expect a
takedown notice from the good folks at Oracle who have structured their
license agreements to prevent precisely this kind of study from getting
published.
Merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-23 18:38:00 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-23 13:27:47 | PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |