Re: creating extension including dependencies

On July 10, 2015 4:16:59 PM GMT+02:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> I think we should copy the SCHEMA option here and document that we
>use
>> the same schema. But it needs to be done in a way that doesn't error
>out
>> if the extension is not relocatable...
>
>Would that propagate down through multiple levels of CASCADE?
>(Although
>I'm not sure it would be sensible for a non-relocatable extension to
>depend on a relocatable one, so maybe the need doesn't arise in
>practice.)

I'd day so. I was thinking it'd adding a flag that allows to pass a schema to a non relocatable extension. That'd then be passed down. I agree that it's unlikely to be used often.

Andres

---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.