Re: Multi-language to be or not to be

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Date: 2007-02-12 13:18:08
Message-ID: 6EB2FD1251AF4BAA87E37980@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Monday, February 12, 2007 11:51:34 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> It's one thing to reject web *pages* that are less than 85% or even 100%
> translated. But no one can require a 85% or 100% translated web *site*. Not
> even Microsoft or IBM can manage that.

I have to agree with PeterE here ... even 15% shows that we are *attempting* to
accommodate other languages ... which would hopefully act as encouragement for
others to submit translations ...

If you expect someone to sit down and translate 85% of the web site into a
language before we consider it useful, it will never get done ... if we accept
"one page at a time" so that ppl see their work / effort is being made use of,
then its less daunting of a project, and more ppl will hopefully get involved
...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFF0GkQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAl/gAJ40yvI8shS2Qs1v98EDGl1+U5CHZwCgtTqw
z6A+Ve+HKS8Fzq7CShO8/pc=
=a5OQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-02-12 13:32:33 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-02-12 13:10:09 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be