| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, "pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |
| Date: | 2009-07-17 11:11:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6D3DC3B6-ABAE-40D4-AFC9-C4B1AF05E578@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>>
>>>>> should i wait until it gets committed or will you assign me some
>>>>> other
>>>>> patch?
>>>>
>>>> How about this one next?
>>>>
>>>> Make pg_restore --clean to delete existing large objects
>>>
>>> Can I have one, too? My patch submitter just concluded his patch
>>> needs
>>> reworking.
>>
>> Sure, how 'bout DefaultACLs?
>>
>
> Didn't DefaultACLs patch come after the cut-off time? Should we look
> at this patch now at all?
I believe that it was 2 hours and ~10 minutes before the cutoff.
...Robert
>
>>
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-17 11:12:46 | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |
| Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2009-07-17 07:44:37 | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |