Re: Seems we need a post-beta1 initdb already

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Seems we need a post-beta1 initdb already
Date: 2007-10-12 23:09:52
Message-ID: 6C7B3080-9155-4196-8B54-406447774528@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Oct 12, 2007, at 17:41 , Tom Lane wrote:

> Also, if we do #2 it means that we have the option to resolve the
> contrib/txid mess by pushing txid into the core backend before beta2.
> Any votes pro or con on that?

+1

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-10-12 23:19:27 Re: Seems we need a post-beta1 initdb already
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2007-10-12 23:02:17 Re: Seems we need a post-beta1 initdb already