From: | "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New snapshot - 08.00.0005 |
Date: | 2005-02-25 11:10:00 |
Message-ID: | 6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F4208053E@poweredge.attiksystem.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Yes, this is a log when using Access 2003, but the same problem appears with Access 2000.
I made another check: another instance of the same database, with different data (less data), runs fine with driver >= 209. Is there anything special in driver >= 209 in the way data in being retrieved?
I'll try to create a small database that allows you to recreate the error. But mainly, this is simply a pass-through query from Access, nothing more.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
Envoyé : vendredi, 25. février 2005 11:57
À : Philippe Lang; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Objet : RE: [ODBC] New snapshot - 08.00.0005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Lang [mailto:philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch]
> Sent: 24 February 2005 16:52
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] New snapshot - 08.00.0005
>
> Sorry if it's a bit long, but here we are:
Hmm, they are essentially identical. Iirc, you said this was in Access?
Can you provide me a simple MDB to test with please, and I'll try to recreate the error here (it'll be in Access 2K3).
Thanks, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-02-25 11:16:01 | Re: New snapshot - 08.00.0005 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-02-25 10:57:18 | Re: New snapshot - 08.00.0005 |