| From: | Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management |
| Date: | 2012-11-20 13:49:12 |
| Message-ID: | 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C383BC786B2@szxeml509-mbx |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, November 19, 2012 8:52 PM Amit kapila wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:53 AM Jeff Janes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>>Run the modes in reciprocating order?
>>> Sorry, I didn't understood this, What do you mean by modes in reciprocating order?
>> By reciprocating, I mean to run them in the reverse order, or in random order.
> Today for some configurations, I have ran by reciprocating the order.
The detailed data for all other various configuration is attached with this mail.
> The 2 problems which are observed in V-Tune Profiler Reports for Buffer Management are:
> a. Partition Lock
> b. Buf-Free List Lock
> Tommorow, I will send you some of the profiler reports for different scenario where the above is observed.
Still not able to prepare reoprt. Shall try tommorow.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Results.htm | text/html | 48.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-11-20 13:51:28 | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-11-20 13:43:09 | Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks |