From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question on SIGFPE in Windows |
Date: | 2006-08-18 11:34:45 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35546@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> SIGFPE is a synchornous signal and Windows will raise it if proper
> flag is set (check out the example program):
>
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/kfy34skx.aspx
>
> But seems we didn't use the above method. Instead, we use the same
> methodology as other asynchrounous signals. My question is: (1) can
> windows really raise SIGFPE in our setting && (2) can we really
> catch it in windows?
(1) No, because we haven't enabled it.
(2) No, not the way things are set up. But because of (1), that's not a
problem.
There should be a discussion in the archives during the 8.0 development
cycle about this.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-08-18 11:46:05 | Re: Windows 2000 Support |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2006-08-18 11:30:16 | Re: pg_terminate_backend |