| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 max connections bug (causing crashes) |
| Date: | 2006-08-18 10:46:27 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35536@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Maybe this article can help:
> >
> > Windows and the ClearCase process limit: Understanding the
> desktop
> > heap
> > http://www-
> 128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/1220_marecha
> > l/
> >
>
> i doubled all my heap settings and was able to roughly double the -
> c
> on pgbench from ~158 (stock) to ~330 (modified). so this is
> definately the problem.
If you try decreasing max_files_per_process to a significantly lower
value (say, try 100 instead of 1000), does the number of processes you
can run change noticeably?
(I don't have a box around ATM that I can try to reproduce on. Will try
to set up a VM for it soon.)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2006-08-18 10:50:12 | Re: Removing the performance gap caused by CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-08-18 08:50:30 | Sorry about the GIN docs :( |