Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, <Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed
Date: 2006-05-02 08:14:10
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35336@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> With the patch applied, I let an inhouse stress test run for
> several hours and it completed without incident. I also ran
> two runs of pgbench with 50 connections x 1000 transactions
> and one run of 50 connections x 5000 transactions. All
> completed successfully. (Test server is a dual Xeon with
> HyperThreading enabled, Windows Server 2003, PG 8.1.3).

Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James 2006-05-02 10:34:12 BUG #2417: bug for finding string in column
Previous Message Peter Brant 2006-05-01 16:50:50 Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed