| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |
| Date: | 2006-09-17 13:14:58 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FBB7@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
> Two points I'm not clear about on this thread though:
>
> 1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or
> someone who has been authorized by someone else?
IIRC, the idea was "someone with an account". Basically you add a (very
very small) hurdle so you only get the people who actually *care* to
write things. But if you do care, it's not a lot of work. You also get
traceability, so you can talk to whomever wrote a certain thing.
I don't see any gain in having someone specifically authorize who can
write to it.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-17 13:20:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-17 13:13:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-17 13:17:07 | Re: Still waiting on pmt.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-17 13:13:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |