Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Date: 2006-09-16 10:59:17
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FBA5@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> > Thing is, we already have both of these things set up using
> Gavin Roy's
> > code. So I'd see it as a big waste of time for the WWW
> team to hack them
> > toghter just to save a domain.
> >
>
> Also, the WWW team doesn't have the resources to keep up with
> the likely volume of content changes that will happen on this
> site from a week to week and month to month basis.
>
> Unlike www which is a fairly static site, the funds site will
> likely change often.

Now, I would like to see that as an argument *for* integrating it -
simply because that would give more hands working on the day-to-day
parts of -www. Which definitly wouldn't be a bad thing.
But I'm certainly not going to push it...

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-09-16 12:46:17 Re: Still waiting on pmt.postgresql.org
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-09-16 10:58:37 Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?