| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Samad, Alex" <alexander(dot)samad(at)hp(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres and ldap |
| Date: | 2006-06-16 13:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA2E@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > > 8.2 will have direct LDAP authentication without PAM.
> >
> > That code's going to go away real soon if some
> documentation doesn't
> > show up. I can't believe Bruce was sloppy enough to accept
> a feature
> > patch with zero documentation.
>
> ?? I thought I had sent in the docs for that. Will dig
> through my notes when I get home to resubmit. (I have
> certainly written it, because my local docs copy has it!)
Actually, the docs *were* submitted. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/msg00375.php.
Applied per
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00080.php, I
think it's just the docs that were missed.
I don't recall any feedback about updating them, so I think that patch
still stands.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-06-16 13:55:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-16 13:47:23 | Re: postgres and ldap |