| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Christoph Zwerschke" <cito(at)online(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Finding the pqlib version |
| Date: | 2006-02-21 20:38:58 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F7CB@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
> > But I'm actually thinking we should perhaps put it as a base feature
> > - along with libpq, being installed as soon as you install
> any part at
> > all. Does that sound reasonable?
>
> No.
>
> As I said previously, pg_config really belongs together with
> the include files and the link libraries.
But what about things like pg_config --bindir, pg_config --version,
pg_config --sharedir etc - they are definitly usable even if you're not
developing C language server extensions, aren't they?
> Perhaps the categories are not so well chosen altogether.
That I can agree with :-) I beleive they were originally split so you
could change the directory used for each part. But I don't think we
allow that anymore.
What would ppl suggest? Put it all together as one feature? Or keep
grouping in part?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Zwerschke | 2006-02-21 22:34:07 | Re: Finding the pqlib version |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-21 20:22:42 | Re: Finding the pqlib version |