| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rod Taylor" <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Gevik babakhani" <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |
| Date: | 2005-06-22 07:04:03 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C76EB@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > > Rod,
> > >
> > >
> > >>The question is are people willing to use the Bricolage interface
> > >>for writing and maintaining articles?
> > >
> > >
> > > I am. And I think others will be to. If the templates
> are set up,
> > > submitting stuff as a writer is easy.
And this is the main point. As long as it's easy, content writers will
probably be happy regardless of the tool. They should focus on
*content*, and usually that's what they want. As long as the tool is
"reasonably like other tools" and doesn't invent something completely
new, it shouldn't be ap roblem.
> > I would be willing.
>
> Great. Please forward some content samples and directions on
> how to access this Bricolage installation so I can setup the
> element blocks and templates.
http://techdocs.postgresql.org
AFAIK the idea is to migrate all content (checking that it's still
current). Check for example "Josh Berkus adventures" (love the title!)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-22 12:42:35 | Broken patch link on Roadmap page |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-22 00:29:27 | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |