| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Weiping" <laser(at)qmail(dot)zhengmai(dot)net(dot)cn>, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL www" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New Chinese FAQ |
| Date: | 2005-05-17 07:25:29 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C74CA@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > The output should be UTF8, and it should autodetect it. The output
> > from the *website* should *not* validate as gb2312, because
> it is no
> > longer in that encoding.
> >
> > The reason that's the only error you get may be that it doesn't
> > validate the document because of encoding errors. So this doesn't
> > prove (or disprove for that matter) that the tags are fixed.
> >
>
> Yes, I was using the doctype of HTML 4.0 when I tested, but
> when it was on the web site only then was XHTML Traditional tested.
I think yuuo are missing thep oint. The file that is in CVS does *not*
have to be XHTML. Actually, I'm not even sure it works as XHTML (it
should, but I haven't tested it). It has to be proper HTML v4, plus a
bunch of other restrictions. Basically it has to be the same type of
HTML as the other FAQs.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-05-17 07:26:21 | Re: New Chinese FAQ |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-17 04:19:44 | Re: New Chinese FAQ |