Re: Added columns to pg_stat_activity

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Added columns to pg_stat_activity
Date: 2005-05-09 15:31:31
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7454@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Certainly seems that way. Missed a .diff for the rules output there...
Should be a simple replace, from what I can tell what's in the output on
the buildfarm boxes I checked is correct, the expected file shuold
changed.

Oops.

//Magnus

>
> Is this what broke the regression tests on HEAD?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> If the stats collector gets sufficiently backed up, you will lose
> >> messages. [...] Please do not try to make piecemeal
> changes in that
> >> basic design decision.
> >
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > > (Actually, we could skinny it down to backend PID only ...
> >
> >> but that would add a hashtable lookup to every message
> reception in
> >> the stats collector, instead of just indexing into a
> BackendId array,
> >> so it'd probably be a net loss.)
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I agree -- backend ID and database ID isn't too bad.
> >
> > I've applied Magnus patch and bumped the catalog version.
> I'll take a
> > look at reorganizing the statistics collector so that the message
> > header is smaller shortly.
> >
> > -
>
>

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-05-09 15:45:24 Re: Added columns to pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-09 15:27:04 Re: Added columns to pg_stat_activity