| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze timings |
| Date: | 2005-03-21 08:49:05 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C70F2@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> > I still left two #ifdefs in there, for the addition and
> subtraction of
> > timeval:s specifically. They could be made functions/macros
> too, just
> > not sure if it's worth it.
>
> Probably not. What bothers me more is the unconditional use
> of a static inline function; but IIRC we are only supporting
> gcc-based builds on Windows, so that probably isn't worth
> fixing either.
I thought of that, and considered it a good thing to do it that way just
because of that. If we ever port it to something that doesn't support
it, we can always make it a regular function in the C file.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Mous | 2005-03-23 09:57:09 | Simple query takes a long time on win2K |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-03-20 23:09:03 | Re: Half filled xlogs |