Re: PGSQL 8.0.1 Win 2K Installation Problem

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Jonel Rienton" <jonel(at)road14(dot)com>, "postgres list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <sdownie(at)myway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PGSQL 8.0.1 Win 2K Installation Problem
Date: 2005-02-20 13:55:58
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476900@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I assume this is also VirtuaL PC on the mac, right? I've been using
VirtualPC on the PC for a lot of th dev work on the intaller, and it
should certaily work there..

Does this only occur with win2k, or does it also occur with
XP/2003/whatever?

In the end I doubt there is much we can do, it seems to be an issue of
Virtual PC not being close enough to a PC.

//Magnus

>-----Original Message-----
>From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jonel Rienton
>Sent: den 20 februari 2005 00:52
>To: postgres list
>Cc: sdownie(at)myway(dot)com
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PGSQL 8.0.1 Win 2K Installation Problem
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>just to let you know, i got the same error message when i tried it on
>my win2k inistall emulated by Virtual PC 7.
>
>- -----
>Jonel Rienton
>http://blogs.road14.com
>Software Developer, *nix Advocate
>On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:14 PM, S.D. wrote:
>
>>
>> I downloaded the PostGreSQL Windows installer from another FTP site
>> but I still ended up with the same arcane error message when I tried
>> to install PostGreSQL 8.0.1 on W2K running inside Virtual PC 6
>> (Macintosh).
>>
>> I then ran the installer on a "real" computer (Athlon 1900 running
>> W2K) and the installation went as advertised.
>>
>> So I've got to believe that there is some bug that results from the
>> interaction of the PostGreSQL installer and the chip set emulated by
>> Virtual PC 6. If I'm the first person to attempt to install
>PostGreSQL
>> 8.0.1 in that environment, then I guess this is a bug report. :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
>> Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of
>> broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: PGP 8.1
>
>iQA/AwUBQhfDEOAwOVAnbsGCEQKhvACdF5B5qdIoI0Em2F9RSwb0WvPNFeAAoPSQ
>8li8cwOaP6kHrbdktvR+1jHL
>=3lPx
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>---------------------------(end of
>broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clodoaldo Pinto 2005-02-20 15:35:02 Re: 7.4.6 FC2 MUCH slower from 2.6.9-1.11 to 2.6.10-1.8
Previous Message Phil Endecott 2005-02-20 13:24:49 Scalability with large numbers of tables