Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,<pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-07 22:38:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
>  > Perhaps there is another extension that is good for Win32 
>but i don't
>> think *.txt is it.
>If there needs to be an extension, the new MS thinking in .NET 
>seems to 
>favour .config files. Both ASP.NET web applications and windows .NET 
>executables are automatically given associated .config files by visual 

Well, those are both XML files that follow a very specific schema (and
it's the same schema for both these, except there are of course some
tags not relevant in each one). I don't see the ".net does it" argument
as very powerful unless we go all the way - and we don't want to do

My vote is to either go with .txt - to make it autoopen - or go with no
extension at all (as in unix, except remove the initial dot that makes
the whole filename into the extension).



pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-07 22:46:54
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-07 22:35:45
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group