| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Date: | 2005-01-07 22:38:09 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476524@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> > Perhaps there is another extension that is good for Win32
>but i don't
>> think *.txt is it.
>>
>
>If there needs to be an extension, the new MS thinking in .NET
>seems to
>favour .config files. Both ASP.NET web applications and windows .NET
>executables are automatically given associated .config files by visual
>studio.net
Well, those are both XML files that follow a very specific schema (and
it's the same schema for both these, except there are of course some
tags not relevant in each one). I don't see the ".net does it" argument
as very powerful unless we go all the way - and we don't want to do
that.
My vote is to either go with .txt - to make it autoopen - or go with no
extension at all (as in unix, except remove the initial dot that makes
the whole filename into the extension).
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-01-07 22:46:54 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-07 22:35:45 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |