Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date: 2004-11-01 21:42:25
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE47607E@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

>> I was also hoping to piggyback the socket fix on top of this
>> infrastructure. And that *requires* the
>write-files-after-createprocess
>> method. There is no other way.
>
>Oh, I had forgotten about that part of the problem. Okay, just gotta
>hold our noses and do it I guess.
>
>(Just to be clear: the plan is CreateProcess in suspended state, then
>write_backend_variables, then start the child's thread, right?
>Otherwise seems you got a race condition.)

Right, that's the plan.

I'll see what I can get together over the next couple of days.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-11-01 21:48:02 windows compile warnings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-01 21:39:42 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wood, Bruce 2004-11-02 19:28:04 Edit query buffer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-01 21:39:42 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item