Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Shachar Shemesh" <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pginstaller-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence
Date: 2004-09-29 10:17:26
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE475D9B@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> > * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> > * software must display the following acknowledgment:
> > * "This product includes software developed by the
> OpenSSL Project
> > * for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)"
> >
> >
> I read it to mean that you should mention that only if you
> tout the SSL option of pgAdmin. I hate the advertising clause.
>
> Can we contact them and see if they were part of the group
> that agreed to switch to the three points BSD license without
> the advertising clause?

OpenSSL isn't BSD license, and AFAIK never was. It has an apache style
license. Don'tt hink that would apply.

I guess if we're unsure we could always mail them and ask, though!

//Magnus

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-09-29 10:30:16 Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence
Previous Message cvs 2004-09-29 10:16:42 CVS Commit by dpage: Add OpenSSL licence.