| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Garamond" <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl |
| Date: | 2004-03-24 22:30:20 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34B5CE@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> >>Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing
> >>pg_ctl
> >>in C?
> >
> > Why bother? I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a
> > service.
>
> Except when a non administrator wants to run his own PG instance.
This is one of the reasons why a pg_ctl is still needed. The other is if
you run the server in debugging on the commandline. You can shut it down
with Ctrl-C, but you can't send signals to reload etc.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-24 23:10:01 | Re: pg_ctl |
| Previous Message | David Garamond | 2004-03-24 20:14:22 | Re: pg_ctl |