Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?

From: Richard Yen <richyen(at)iparadigms(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?
Date: 2010-07-08 19:34:19
Message-ID: 6BC21EA1-096A-4A2F-B770-37CE744CADE2@iparadigms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> (Hmm ... but those complaints are logged at level WARNING, which as
> discussed elsewhere is really lower than LOG. Should we change them?)

Hmm, I did a grep on "WARNING" on my log, and the only thing that turns up are the "WARNING: terminating connection because of crash of another server process" entries when postgres died and shut down when the disks filled up.

Would this be conclusive evidence that archive_mode=off?

--Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Wexler 2010-07-08 19:37:58 Re: performance on new linux box
Previous Message Jochen Erwied 2010-07-08 19:32:33 Re: performance on new linux box