From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
Date: | 2022-12-27 18:05:06 |
Message-ID: | 6B6A5C77-60AD-4A71-9F3A-B2C026A281A6@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 27, 2022, at 12:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Here's a patch that covers the ltree and intarray contrib modules.
>
> I would probably have done this a little differently --- I think
> the added "res" parameters aren't really necessary for most of
> these. But it's not worth arguing over.
I’ll take another look
>
>> I think that would leave just hstore to be done.
>
> Yeah, that matches my scoreboard. Are you going to look at
> hstore, or do you want me to?
>
>
Go for it.
Cheers
Andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-12-27 19:24:49 | recovery modules |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-12-27 17:47:18 | Re: Error-safe user functions |