| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Reword docs of feature "Remove temporary files after backend crash" |
| Date: | 2022-04-01 13:42:36 |
| Message-ID: | 6B3AF85B-0F1B-45E0-9D6E-203BB059BF4C@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 08:40, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a v2 patch that I could come up with. Please review it further.
+ debugging, for example. Repeated crashes may however result in
+ accumulation of useless files. This parameter can only be set in the
I think "useless" is a bit too strong and subjective given that it's describing
an unknown situation out of the ordinary. How about "outdated" or "redundant"
(or something else entirely which is even better)?
> I've also made a CF entry - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3356/
This has been sitting the CF for quite some time, time to make a decision on
it. I think it makes sense, having detailed docs around debugging is rarely a
bad thing. Does anyone else have opinions?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-01 13:51:55 | Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-04-01 13:35:34 | Re: [PATCH] src/interfaces/libpq/Makefile: fix pkg-config without openssl |