From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: use of OID.Unknown |
Date: | 2005-11-08 16:32:49 |
Message-ID: | 6A9030FD-2EB3-4D8C-8A6D-6897EAD27A3A@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
It's my impression that we don't get near the level of testing that
the server does. Most people only download whatever we tag as stable.
In other words our real testing cycle occurs once a release has been
made.
This is really a one line change in the code, now how it interacts
with the backend is certainly more complex.
Dave
On 8-Nov-05, at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>> Before we cut an 8.1 stable release, I'd like to revisit the use of
>> unknown for strings at a minimum.
>
> Isn't it *way* too late to be revisiting such questions for 8.1?
>
> I'd be fairly worried about breaking cases that work conveniently
> today. It sounds like something to experiment with during a devel
> cycle, not to cram in at the last moment with no field testing.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-08 16:49:33 | Re: use of OID.Unknown |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-08 16:17:20 | Re: use of OID.Unknown |