Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Date: 2010-08-09 15:28:57
Message-ID: 6A36AA29-D38D-4E90-B58C-D4038F24B54B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 8, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Um, but \sf *doesn't* give you anything that's usefully copy and
> pasteable. And if that were the goal, why doesn't it have an option to
> write to a file?
>
> But it's really the line numbers shoved in front that I'm on about here.
> I can't see *any* use for that behavior except to figure out what part of
> your function an error message with line number is referring to; and as
> I said upthread, there are better ways to be attacking that problem.
> If you've got a thousand-line function (yes, they're out there) do you
> really want to be scrolling through \sf output to find out what line 714
> is?

Suggestion:

\sf without line numbers
\sf+ with line numbers

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-09 15:30:24 Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2010-08-09 15:25:21 Re: regclass, \d command and temp tables