From: | Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Operation log for major operations |
Date: | 2023-01-20 09:19:23 |
Message-ID: | 69d49e4f-a7ab-e36b-cf2c-1e0809d0234a@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks, Ted Yu!
> Please update year for the license in pg_controllog.c
License updated for files pg_controllog.c, controllog_utils.c,
pg_controllog.h, controllog_utils.h.
> +check_file_exists(const char *datadir, const char *path)
> There is existing helper function such as:
> src/backend/utils/fmgr/dfmgr.c:static bool file_exists(const char *name);
> Is it possible to reuse that code ?
There are a lot of functions that check the file existence:
1) src/backend/utils/fmgr/dfmgr.c:static bool file_exists(const char *name);
2) src/backend/jit/jit.c:static bool file_exists(const char *name);
3) src/test/regress/pg_regress.c:bool file_exists(const char *file);
4) src/bin/pg_upgrade/exec.c:bool pid_lock_file_exists(const char *datadir);
5) src/backend/commands/extension.c:bool extension_file_exists(const
char *extensionName);
But there is no unified function: different components use their own
function with their own specific.
Probably we can not reuse code of dfmgr.c:file_exists() because this
function skip "errno == EACCES" (this error is critical for us).
I copied for src/bin/pg_rewind/file_ops.c:check_file_exists() code of
function jit.c:file_exists() (with adaptation for the utility).
--
With best regards,
Dmitry Koval
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Operation-log.patch | text/plain | 47.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maxim Orlov | 2023-01-20 09:19:37 | Re: Add SHELL_EXIT_CODE to psql |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-01-20 09:13:08 | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |