Re: Add sentence about SECURITY LABEL object ownership

On 6/5/25 4:21 PM, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> +
>> + <para>
>> + You must own the database object to use the <command>SECURITY LABEL</command>.
>> + </para>
>> </refsect1>
>>
>> <refsect1>
>
> Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that you have to be a member of the owning role?
> But perhaps that would be complicated enough to confuse many users.

We're calling check_object_ownership which errors out with:

aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, [...])

which in turn then aborts with "must be owner of [...]". But checking
the code, we do call has_privs_of_role, so you're absolutely right.

In doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_*.sgml we use the phrase "You must own the
[...]" to describe the privileges needed. Let me know if you want me to
change the wording.

While double checking I noticed that other docs don't have the extra
"the " before "<command>[...] " so I dropped that in my v2 patch.

Thanks for reviewing!
Patrick