| From: | "Clark, Joel" <jclark(at)lendingtree(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tom Samplonius'" <tom(at)sdf(dot)com>, Adam Lang <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | RE: PG on a web-server...issues..and some general qu estions on PG deployment | 
| Date: | 2000-12-22 19:33:48 | 
| Message-ID: | 69F195289743D411B428009027E293C402671096@CLTEXCH1 | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces | 
I think you get a persistent connection per httpd process, no?  If this
really is the case, you could then limit your connection count by limiting
the number of times that apache will spawn a new process (10 is default,
IIRC)  This isn't exactly true pooling, but should be flexible enough to
meet the intent...  :)
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Samplonius [mailto:tom(at)sdf(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:39 AM
To: Adam Lang
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] PG on a web-server...issues..and some general
questions on PG deployment
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Adam Lang wrote:
> > 3. Is PHP/Postgres module capable of server side connection pooling?
> 
> Yes.
  The PHP docs are very clear to not referr to it is pooling, but
persistant connections.  They are very different things.  PHP as a whole
is not capable of pooling, because a separate instance of PHP runs in each
httpd process, and those instances can not shared database connections
between them.
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Sims | 2000-12-22 23:19:16 | ODBC on Solaris | 
| Previous Message | Tom Samplonius | 2000-12-22 16:38:41 | Re: PG on a web-server...issues..and some general questions on PG deployment |