Re: idea for concurrent seqscans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date: 2005-02-25 18:30:57
Message-ID: 6997.1109356257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> writes:
> I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume
> the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)?

We use diff as the checking tool.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-25 18:33:28 Re: Development schedule
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-25 18:28:06 Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?