Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date: 2019-02-23 16:00:57
Message-ID: 6984.1550937657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> I think we're better off just peventing the explicit drop of a temp schema.
> See attached?

I think this is a poor implementation of a bad idea. Would you like a
list of the ways a superuser can break the system? We could start with
"DELETE FROM pg_proc;".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-02-23 16:02:42 Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-23 15:50:47 Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash