| From: | Drew Wilson <drewmwilson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Daniel Cristian Cruz" <danielcristian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Many to many join seems slow? |
| Date: | 2007-05-15 16:43:55 |
| Message-ID: | 694A96DF-65A7-4DCD-972F-97081A554E1B@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Yes, I'll be filtering by string value. However, I just wanted to see
how long it takes to scan all translations in a particular language.
Drew
On May 15, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Drew Wilson <drewmwilson(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> =# explain SELECT s.source_id, s.value AS sourceValue, t.value AS
>> translationValue
>> FROM
>> source s,
>> translation_pair tp,
>> translation t,
>> language l
>> WHERE
>> s.source_id = tp.source_id
>> AND tp.translation_id = t.translation_id
>> AND t.language_id = l.language_id
>> AND l.name = 'French' ;
>>
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Merge Join (cost=524224.49..732216.29 rows=92447 width=97)
>
> This way you get all word matches for the French language. Shouldn't
> it be all matches for a specific word (s.value = 'word' in WHERE)?
>
> --
> Daniel Cristian Cruz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Drew Wilson | 2007-05-15 16:45:07 | Re: Many to many join seems slow? |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Cottenceau | 2007-05-15 16:43:50 | [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal |